I always feel like the odd man out when sitting around a table with other pastors or denominational leaders. I don’t ever feel like a true participant in the deep theological and methodological conversations that seem to pervade these gatherings. I never have anything to add. I am, at best, a spectator or a fly on the wall. I am along for the ride but I never get to drive. I am 35 and outdated. I am a moot point before I open my mouth. I am passe. I am. . . well you get the point. The conversation seems to always move quickly away from anything that I, or my church members, would be familiar with. Terms and definitions start flying around the table from all the latest books, which I probably should have already read, but just haven’t. Things that seem so relevant to some of my friends but somehow seem so distant and meaningless to me.
Here are just a few words, phrases, and questions that seem to dominate evangelical conversation these days:
1. Elders verses deacons. 2. How about a plurality of elders and deacons? 3. John Calvin versus Arminianism. 4. John Calvin verses. . . well just about everyone. 5. I have even heard John Calvin versus Calvinism. (I would personally like to see a loser leave town cage match between Calvin and say. . . . John Wesley.) ANYWAYS back to the list: 6. 20 new definitions of what it means to be reformed. 7. Nine Marks, Mark Dever, and John Piper. 8. Blended versus traditional. 9. Has your church become missional? 10. Do you vision cast? 11. How do you vision cast? 12. What do you think about a multi-site church? 13. What makes you and your church relevant to the culture around you? 14. What are your contextual concerns? 15. What do you think about Emergent churches? 16. Is your church incarnational? 17. Do you still use “Baptist” in your church title? 18. What kind of outreach program have you implemented? 19. How do you move people from the “foyer” of your church to the “living room” of your church? 20. What is your church planting strategy? 21. How do you assimilate people from your small group gatherings into the membership of your church? 22. And my all time favorite: “who is your target group”?
I usually walk away from these brief encounters with the outside world with a renewed sense of joy for how simple our rural route church is. We were simple before “Simple Church” was cool. I admit that, at times, I have struggled the last few years to figure out what kind of congregation our rural church is. Who hasn’t right? Where do we fit? Which book and ministry methodology best describes our experience in Cottage Grove? Which one of those pastor, teacher, and authors am I supposed to be like?
I wondered how my church members would feel sitting around the afore mentioned table as all the new buzz words began to fly. I imagine they would feel like I often do. They would have nothing to add to the conversation. They, like me, would listen intently and politely but would just feel overwhelmed. I think they would have that sinking feeling in the pit of their stomach like I do at times when the conversation moves away from what is familiar. I think they would feel passe and outdated. They would wonder where they fit in. They would wonder if they should even have a place at the table.
Recently I came to a very important conclusion. It was life altering and earth shattering and it only took me about 3 years to discover. COTTAGE GROVE BAPTIST CHURCH KNOWS WHO THEY ARE ALREADY! We don’t have to struggle with identity. For over 100 years our identity has been set. We won’t sell many books and it won’t get me booked as the leader of any conferences but we know who we are. We are in a good place. We are healthy. We are a church that evangelizes, disciples, worships, and fellowships. We are known in our community as a church that cares (does that make us incarnational?). There are some things that have changed (technology) over the years but nothing has changed that would shake the foundation. We are basically doing what we did 100 years ago. We have Sunday school. We have a major emphasis on biblical preaching, discipleship, worship, and fellowship. Even though we are doing what we have always done people are getting saved and young families are joining the church.
About the same time I realized that Cottage Grove already knew who they were I realized that everone else around the table didn’t. It seems that all of Christendom is struggling for identity. Every new book and new term is another attempt at identity. The only time we have struggled over the years is when we have allowed ourselves to be drawn into everyone else’s attempt to be relevant.
Sometimes the best thing you can do is the same thing you’ve been doing. There is nothing wrong with redefining methodology and being open to change. There is something wrong with unnecessary change. I guess each pastor and church has to figure out when to back away from the book buffet and just be who they are. Perhaps a conglomerate of our church members should write a book on how to be relevant for 100 years without changing much. Maybe then we would have something to add to the conversation around the table.